Legal Opinion

Burdess v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 26, 1980No. CA 79-302PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James H. Pilkinton, Judge.

The issue in this case is whether a prescriptive easement in favor of the appellant exists over the lands owned by the appellee, Arkansas Power and Light Company, and commonly referred to during the trial as the “White Bluff Plant Site”.

Appellant and appellee are the respective owners of contiguous tracts of land in Jefferson County, Arkansas. Both tracts lie to the east of Highway 365, to the west of the Arkansas River near Lock and Dam No. 5, to the north of the Pine Bluff Arsenal and the Jefferson River Road, and to the south of the Redfield River Road. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fullenwider v. KitchensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  2. Boullioun v. ConstantineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  3. Stone v. HalliburtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Bridwell v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  5. Corruthers v. KingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burdess v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1982
  2. Carver v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Zunamon v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Ridenoure v. BallCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  5. Smith v. LoydCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API