Legal Opinion

Stone v. Halliburton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 18, 1968No. 5-4415PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

This is the second appeal in this case. On the first appeal, we held that the lower court erred in sustaining a motion to dismiss challenging the sufficiency of the evidence on behalf of appellants to make a prima facie case to establish a prescriptive easement for a road or driveway across the lot on which appellee’s home is situated. Stone v. Halliburton, No. 5-4017, 241 Ark. 710, 409 S. W. 2d 829.

On remand, the trial court heard the testimony of witnesses offered by appellee and rebuttal testimony offered by appellants. The complaint of appellants was dismissed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boullioun v. ConstantineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  2. Lecroy v. SigmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  3. Duty v. VinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  4. Brundidge v. O'NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  5. Harper v. HannibalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Manitowoc Remanufacturing, Inc. v. VocqueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Carson v. County of DrewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Johnson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Owners Ass'n of Foxcroft Woods, Inc. v. Foxglen AssociatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Peregrine Trading, LLC v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API