Ridenoure v. Ball
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge.
I,This is an appeal from an order granting the Balls a prescriptive easement over the Ridenoures’ property in Madison County. The Ridenoures present three arguments to this court: (1) the Balls failed to establish a prescriptive easement in light of evidence showing permissive use; (2) assuming that an easement had been established, said easement was abandoned; and (3) the circuit court’s order grants an easement that is wider than the evidence of adverse use. We previously ordered rebriefing, as the Ridenoures submitted a brief that did not comply with our rules.1 Now…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Manitowoc Remanufacturing, Inc. v. VocqueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Carson v. County of DrewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Owners Ass'n of Foxcroft Woods, Inc. v. Foxglen AssociatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Riffle v. WorthenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- King v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roberts v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
- Acuna v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
- Doran v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
- Carroll v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
- Glendon Bobo and Donnie Bobo v. Cody Ray Askew, Ashlee Michael Askew, and Dorsey Ray AskewCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025