Legal Opinion

Ridenoure v. Ball

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 26, 2011No. CA 10-82PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge.

I,This is an appeal from an order granting the Balls a prescriptive easement over the Ridenoures’ property in Madison County. The Ridenoures present three arguments to this court: (1) the Balls failed to establish a prescriptive easement in light of evidence showing permissive use; (2) assuming that an easement had been established, said easement was abandoned; and (3) the circuit court’s order grants an easement that is wider than the evidence of adverse use. We previously ordered rebriefing, as the Ridenoures submitted a brief that did not comply with our rules.1 Now…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Manitowoc Remanufacturing, Inc. v. VocqueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Carson v. County of DrewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Owners Ass'n of Foxcroft Woods, Inc. v. Foxglen AssociatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Riffle v. WorthenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. King v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roberts v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  2. Acuna v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Doran v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Carroll v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Glendon Bobo and Donnie Bobo v. Cody Ray Askew, Ashlee Michael Askew, and Dorsey Ray AskewCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API