United States v. Borner
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
2Per curiam
The appellant pleaded guilty to larceny, forgery, failure to go to his place of duty and dishonorable failure to pay a just debt. Appellate defense counsel urge that their client’s guilty plea to dishonorably failing to pay a just debt is improvident. We agree.
During the Care inquiry the appellant related that he and Senior Airman Mattis became roommates in October 1985. It was understood that he could use Mattis’ telephone but would be responsible for his own long distance charges. Initially, the appellant paid his share of the phone bill, but as of 1 December he owed Mattis…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
4Cited by5 opinions
- Krzeminski v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- United States v. Brown-AustinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. RapollaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. ThomasU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. BirdineU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1990