Legal Opinion

United States v. Borner

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided December 17, 1986No. ACM S27215PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

2Per curiam

The appellant pleaded guilty to larceny, forgery, failure to go to his place of duty and dishonorable failure to pay a just debt. Appellate defense counsel urge that their client’s guilty plea to dishonorably failing to pay a just debt is improvident. We agree.

During the Care inquiry the appellant related that he and Senior Airman Mattis became roommates in October 1985. It was understood that he could use Mattis’ telephone but would be responsible for his own long distance charges. Initially, the appellant paid his share of the phone bill, but as of 1 December he owed Mattis…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  3. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Krzeminski v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  2. United States v. Brown-AustinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  3. United States v. RapollaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. ThomasU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  5. United States v. BirdineU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API