Decoster v. Commissioner of Taxation
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Commissioner.
Certiorari to review an order of the board of tax appeals affirming a decision of the commissioner of taxation.
The facts bearing on the decision were all stipulated or undisputed. They may be thus stated: On April 14=, 1986, relator’s husband insured his life in the Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, for $50,000. In the policy relator ivas named the beneficiary. The insured retained the right to change the beneficiary and to surrender the policy for its .cash surrender value. October 12, 1938, at the request of the insured and with consent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- State ex rel. Foot v. BazilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- State ex rel. Graff v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- In Re McGrath's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Egekvist Bakeries, Inc. v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blue Diamond Poultry Farms, Inc. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1961
- Westphal v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963