Legal Opinion

Jewelers Mutual Insurance v. Firstar Bank Illinois

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 2004No. 96805PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

At issue is whether the exculpatory clause in defendant Firstar Bank’s safety deposit box rental agreement is enforceable under the facts of this case. We hold that it is not.

BACKGROUND

More than $1 million worth of loose diamonds and jewelry was stolen from three safety deposit boxes that defendant leased to jewel dealers at one of its Chicago branches. The safety deposit box lease agreements provided that the relationship of the parties was that of landlord and tenant, not bailor and bailee. Additionally, the agreement contained the following paragraph:

“1. It is understood that said bank has…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Farm Credit Bank of St. Louis v. WhitlockIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Ivey Plants, Inc. v. FMC CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  4. Bost v. Paulson's Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Shorr Paper Products, Inc. v. Aurora Elevator, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. William Blair & Co. v. Fi Liquidation Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Calvin Horne v. Electric Eel Manufacturing ComCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  3. Statewide Insurance v. Houston General InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. Hartshorn v. State Farm InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. Fan v. AUSTER CO., INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API