Legal Opinion
Doe v. Pfrommer
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 10, 1998No. Docket No. 97-7614PublishedCited by 134 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYBERT, District Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant John Doe brings this appeal of the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees Paul Pfrommer, individually and in his official capacity as Director of the Rochester Office of Vocational Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities (“VESID”), and Lawrence Gloeckler, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Commissioner of the New York State VESID office. Doe brought this ■ action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that the defendants denied him certain rehabilitative services under Title I of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Tony Walker v. Tommy G. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Weixel v. The Board Of Education Of The City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Cave v. East Meadow Union Free School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Matusick v. Erie County Water AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Gad Grieve v. Elisheva TamerinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.