Petco Petroleum Corp. v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America
District Court, S.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GILBERT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendant Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America’s (“NGPL”) motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Doc. 91). Plaintiffs Petco Petroleum Corporation (“Petco”) and Bergman Petroleum Corporation (“BPC”) have responded to the motion (Doc. 104), and NGPL has replied to that response (Doc. 109). The Court also considers the remaining portions of NGPL’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Doc. 49), to which…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. WrightDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010