Legal Opinion

Illingworth v. Bushong

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 22, 1983No. 80-108-L, CA A20104PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover his earnest money deposit, which defendants had retained after plaintiff had defaulted on a contract to purchase their ranch. Plaintiff contends that the liquidated damages provision is unenforceable as a penalty. The trial court agreed and awarded plaintiff judgment for the amount of his deposit ($50,000), less defendants’ actual damages of $6,500. Defendants appeal the court’s ruling that the liquidated damages clause is invalid. Plaintiff cross-appeals, contending that the court erred in failing to award him attorney fees and in setting the rate of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Caesar v. . RubinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Graham v. MerchantOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Marquam Investment Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Wright v. Schutt Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Dean Vincent, Inc. v. McDonoughOregon Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Miller v. Safeco Title Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Illingworth v. BushongOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Dennis I. Spencer Contractor, Inc. v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. Employers' Fire Insurance v. Love It Ice Cream Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Mattvidi Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Nationsbank of Virginia, N.A.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API