Legal Opinion

Foster v. Holt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1953No. 386PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The method of serving process on a nonresident as provided in G.S. 1-105 and 1-106 is ineffective to obtain service of process on a citizen and resident of this State while such citizen is residing temporarily outside the State, or is in the armed services of the United States and stationed in another state or foreign country.

Therefore, at the time Judge Hatch dismissed this action as to the defendant Carl Thomas Holt, at the October Term, 1952, of the Superior Court of Randolph County, the infant defendant Carl Thomas Holt had not been served with legal process. However, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. . BittingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Winders v. Hill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Harrison v. . DillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Revis v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Sprinkle v. City of ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hatcher v. AndersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Denton v. EllisDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. Lesliy v. AronsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Di Fiore v. Erie-Lackawanna RailroadNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API