Legal Opinion
Garry v. TRW, INC.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided January 28, 1985No. Civ. A. C83-2663PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robert D. Garry brings this action against defendants TRW, Inc., and two of its employees, Crawford T. Harvie and Martin Coyle, 1 alleging that they discriminated against him on the basis of age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., (“ADEA”) and Ohio Rev.Code § 4101.17, and further alleging that they interfered with his retirement and profit-sharing benefits in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”). Jurisdiction is proper pursuant to 28…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- William J. Kross v. Western Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Santiago Amaro v. The Continental Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Harold West, Trustees of the Southern Labor Union Welfare Fund and Pension Fund v. James ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Robert Douglas Conkwright v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- William L. Clark v. Resistoflex Company, a Division of Unidynamics Corporation and Its Successor Crane Resistoflex Company, a Division of Crane Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Kohmescher v. Kroger Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Saporito v. Combustion Engineering Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Gary Rawson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.