Legal Opinion
William L. Clark v. Resistoflex Company, a Division of Unidynamics Corporation and Its Successor Crane Resistoflex Company, a Division of Crane Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 14, 1988No. 87-3611PublishedCited by 155 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Appellant William Clark, a former employee of appellee Resistoflex Company (“Resistoflex”), brought suit under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132 et seq., alleging he had been discharged because of his age and because Resistoflex desired to prevent him from accruing enhanced benefits under the pen sion plan in which he was vested. After extensive discovery, the district court granted summary judgment for Resistoflex on grounds that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Robert C. Hahn v. Francis W. SargentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- N. Brown FELTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAVES-HUMPHREYS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Love v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by155 opinions
- S.W.S. Erectors, Inc. v. Infax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- William T. Turner v. Schering-Plough CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Hiram AMBURGEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CORHART REFRACTORIES CORPORATION, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Robert Douglas Conkwright v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Clark v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.