Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1936No. Civ. 10846PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff, employed by defendant corporation as switchman, brought this action for damages for injuries suffered when the impact of cars shunted by a switch engine precipitated him from the roof of a freight car to the ground below. Negligence of defendant in two particulars was alleged, viz., that the string of freight cars upon which plaintiff was working was equipped with faulty handbrakes, in violation of the Federal Safety Appliance Act, and that unusual force and violence, without warning to plaintiff, were used by his fellow employees in shunting other cars against…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Dawson v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Qualls v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Still v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Matthews v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Newkirk v. Los Angeles Junction Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  4. White v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Frank Eresafe v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, and Wilson & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API