Lawson v. Hoke
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*256GILLETTE, J.
This personal injury action arising out of an automobile collision raises a fundamental issue concerning the legislature’s ability to choose a particular legal device as a way to advance a particular public policy. Here, the legislature chose the device of precluding an award of certain forms of civil damages to those who violate the policy in question— compulsory automobile insurance — as a kind of “stick” to encourage persons to abide by that public policy. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the legislative choice in this particular case is a constitutionally…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
- DeMendoza v. HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Jensen v. WhitlowOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Bileu v. PaisleyOregon Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Hughes v. PeaceHealthOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- Juarez v. Windsor Rock Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Howell v. BoyleOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Busch v. McInnis Waste Systems, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2020
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.