Legal Opinion

Lawson v. Hoke

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 2005No. CC 0101-00766; CA A117388; SC S51044PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*256GILLETTE, J.

This personal injury action arising out of an automobile collision raises a fundamental issue concerning the legislature’s ability to choose a particular legal device as a way to advance a particular public policy. Here, the legislature chose the device of precluding an award of certain forms of civil damages to those who violate the policy in question— compulsory automobile insurance — as a kind of “stick” to encourage persons to abide by that public policy. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the legislative choice in this particular case is a constitutionally…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. DeMendoza v. HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Jensen v. WhitlowOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Bileu v. PaisleyOregon Supreme Court · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Hughes v. PeaceHealthOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Juarez v. Windsor Rock Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Howell v. BoyleOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Busch v. McInnis Waste Systems, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2020

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API