Juarez v. Windsor Rock Products, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
The plaintiffs in this tort case ask this court to determine “[w]hether the negligent infliction of harm great enough to cause death is an injury for which the Oregon Constitution guarantees a remedy.” In our view, the primary issue in this case is much narrower. We must decide whether these plaintiffs have alleged a claim that the remedy clause of Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution, protects. For the reasons outlined below, we hold that the claim that plaintiffs have pleaded in their complaint is not such a claim.
Because the trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Insurance Co. v. BrameSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Mayhew v. BurnsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- G. L. v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Kilminster v. Day Management Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Doe v. Lake Oswego School DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Lowe v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2008
- Hughes v. PeaceHealthOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- Mid-Century Insurance v. PerkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.