Legal Opinion

McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Gates

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 4, 1888PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Jasper District Court. — Hon. D. Ryan, Judge. Action iu equity to subject certain real estate' to tlie payment of a judgment against tbe defendant A. C. Gates. There was a demurrer to the petition, which was sustained, and, defendants electing to stand thereon, the relief asked by plaintiff was granted.

1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, C. J.

1. Will construction: life estate: alienation restricted. — The plaintiff obtained a judgment against the defendant A. C. Gates, and in this action seeks to subject certain real estate, which said Gates has a title to, or interest in, to payment of said judgment. Whatever right or interest A. C. Gates may have in the real estate was derived under the will of E. M. Gates, and it is as follows: “I have placed my son Alvin C. Gates on a *344farm near Colfax, in said county, described as the southwest quarter and the north half of the southeast quarter of section eleven, township seventy-nine, range…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCleary v. EllisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  2. Reed v. ReedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
  3. Lewis v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1878
  4. Deering v. TuckerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1867
  5. Bowman v. PinkhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1880

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Meek v. BriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  2. Lee v. PercivalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  3. Seay v. CockrellTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Henderson v. HarnessIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Teany v. MainsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API