Legal Opinion

Generac Corporation v. Caterpillar Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 30, 1999No. 97-1404PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.

From 1992 until 1996, Generac Corporation served as a dealer of certain generators that it manufactured under license from Caterpillar Inc. In June 1996, Caterpillar decided to terminate its agreement with Generac and find a new business partner. Generac fought back with a suit under the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law (“WFDL”), the Sherman Act, the Wisconsin common law concerning restrictive covenants, and the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. The district court, in two separate orders, disposed of the entire action in Caterpillar’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. State Oil Co. v. KhanSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. Topco Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Cromeens, Holloman, Sibert, Inc. v. AB VolvoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. Nabors Drilling USA, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  3. In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  4. Sheridan v. Marathon Petroleum Co. LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Home InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API