Legal Opinion · Dissent

Federal Land Bank v. Bismarck Lumber Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1941No. File No. 6549Published

1DissentChristianson, J.

I dissent. The question for decision here is whether sales of personal property within this state to a Federal Land Bank are subject to the state sales tax. The State Sales Tax Act (Laws 1937, Chap. 249) in force during the time involved in this controversy provided:

Section 2. “There is hereby imposed ... a tax of two per cent (2%) upon the gross receipts from all sales of tangible personal property, consisting of goods, wares, or merchandise, except as otherwise provided in this Act, sold at retail in the state of North Dakota to consumers or users. ...”

Section 3. “There are hereby…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Graves v. New York Ex Rel. O'KeefeSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API