Legal Opinion
Jacobs v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 29, 2016No. A16A1115PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Judge.
Brian Evan Jacobs appeals from his conviction for DUI per se. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress (1) certain statements he made to police and (2) the results of a chemical testing of his blood. The trial court correctly concluded that Jacobs was not in custody when he made the statements in question and therefore the statements were not taken in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 LE2d 694) (1966). The trial court also correctly rejected Jacobs’ request to suppress the results of the blood test because Jacobs…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- State v. PastoriniCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- The State v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- The State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- MACMASTER v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Jackson v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- DIAZ v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.