Legal Opinion
Shanak v. City of Waupaca
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided May 19, 1994No. 92-1055PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.
Michael Shanak, Jr. and Virginia Shanak d/b/a Shanak Foundry & Machine Company (Shanaks) appeal from a judgment in favor of the City of Waupaca (City). We affirm the judgment in part and reverse in part.
I. NATURE OF THE CASE
Shanaks own a millpond, dike, dam, hydroelectric plant and machine shop, all in the City. The Crystal River feeds the pond. The pond provides water to the hydroelectric plant which produces power for their machine shop and for sale to a utility. The dam, which regulates the pond's water level, is built against the pond side of a stone arch in the dike. The dam consists of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Prah v. MarettiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. DeetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Pure Milk Products Cooperative v. National Farmers OrganizationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Metzger v. Wisconsin Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Hammond v. HammondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Roundy's Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Menick v. City of MenashaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- Camino Sin Pasada Neighborhood Ass'n v. RockstrohNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Schultz v. TrascherCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- Mnuk v. Harmony Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.