Callahan v. Holsman
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Concurrence
Robson, P. J.,
specially concurring:
I concur in the conclusion of my colleagues that the complaint does not state a prima facie case for final relief such as would entitle the plaintiffs to an interlocutory injunction against defendants Samuel L. Rosenblatt and Joseph G. Engert, but I do not concur in their conclusion that the verification to the complaint upon which the injunction order was issued is adequate.
A long line of decisions have held that where a part of the relief prayed for in a complaint is an interlocutory injunction and certain allegations pertaining to such relief are made on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Christian Hospital v. People ex rel. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Stirlen v. NeustadtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
- Siegmund v. AscherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
- Board of Trade v. RiordanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
- Farrell v. HeibergIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.