Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Callahan v. Holsman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 4, 1953No. Gen. 46,031Published

1Concurrence

Robson, P. J.,

specially concurring:

I concur in the conclusion of my colleagues that the complaint does not state a prima facie case for final relief such as would entitle the plaintiffs to an interlocutory injunction against defendants Samuel L. Rosenblatt and Joseph G. Engert, but I do not concur in their conclusion that the verification to the complaint upon which the injunction order was issued is adequate.

A long line of decisions have held that where a part of the relief prayed for in a complaint is an interlocutory injunction and certain allegations pertaining to such relief are made on…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Christian Hospital v. People ex rel. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Stirlen v. NeustadtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  3. Siegmund v. AscherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  4. Board of Trade v. RiordanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  5. Farrell v. HeibergIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API