Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Heiberg

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1914PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of LaSalle county; the Hoh. W. H. Hinebaugh, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vickers

At an election held November 5, 1912, appellant and appellee were opposing candidates for the office of auditor of LaSalle county. Heiberg, the appellant, was declared elected. Farrell, the appellee, contested the election and the county court found that Farrell was elected. This is an appeal by Heiberg for the purpose of obtaining a réview of the record of the county court.

■ At the October term, 1913, of this court the case of Edward Rottner against John F. Buchner, who had been opposing candidates for the office of recorder of deeds of LaSalle county at the November election, 1912, was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Daugherty v. CarnineIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Rottner v. BuchnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Weingart v. WeingartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  2. Hulse v. NashIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Armbrust v. StarkeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Rutledge v. Department of Registration & EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  5. Waters v. HeatonIllinois Supreme Court · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API