Legal Opinion

Stirlen v. Neustadt

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 4, 1893PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Memorandum.—Bill for injunction. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook’County; the Hon. Philip Stein, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1893.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion oe the Court,

Shepard, J.

This appeal is from an order granting an injunction enjoining the collection of a judgment. The bill was verified by the complainant, who swore that he had a read the same and knows the contents thereof, and that the same is true of his own knowledge, except as to the matters stated therein on information and belief, and as to those he believes it to be true.”

That form of verification has been repeatedly condemned by this court. Brabrook Tailoring Company v. Belding, 40 Ill. App. 326, and cases there cited.

We are aware of no recognized precedent that sanctions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Roberts v. FahsIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Joslyn v. DickersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Brabrook Tailoring Co. v. Belding Bros.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  5. Camp v. BryanIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commerce Vault v. HurdAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898
  2. Decker v. WestAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934
  3. Neil v. OldachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  4. In re GlassDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1902
  5. Werner Co. v. First National Bank of MiamisburgAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API