Legal Opinion

State v. Eisenman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 14, 1998PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

STEIN, J.

This appeal presents two issues for resolution. The first, whether defendant’s criminal prosecution for absconding from parole is barred by principles of double jeopardy and fundamental fairness because of the Parole Board’s prior revocation of his parole for substantially the same conduct, is virtually indistinguishable from the issue raised and resolved in State v. Black, 153 N.J. 438, 451-453, 455-456, 710 A.2d 428, 435-436, 437 (1998), also decided today. The second question is whether the trial court, which sentenced defendant on the same…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. State v. YarboughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  5. State v. GhertlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. CareySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  2. State v. SimonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. State v. PenningtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  4. State v. LivingstonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  5. Nobrega v. Edison Glen AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API