Legal Opinion

State v. Ghertler

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 28, 1989PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Per curiam

In State v. Roth, 95 N.J. 334 (1984), we assured our trial judges that when they “exercise discretion in accordance with the principles set forth in the Code and defined by us * * *, they need fear no second-guessing.” Id. at 365. This appeal and cross-appeal test the measure of that commitment.

On defendant’s guilty plea to various property crimes the sentencing court imposed two consecutive five-year terms with two-and-one-half year periods of parole ineligibility. Hence the aggregate sentence was ten years, with a five-year parole disqualifier. On appeal the Appellate Division, in an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. State v. YarboughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. State v. HodgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. State v. DunbarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. State v. JarbathSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. State v. BieniekSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  3. State v. DalzielSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  4. State v. CareySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  5. State v. RoachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API