Legal Opinion
Central Pines Land Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 12, 2004No. 98-314LPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YOCK, Senior Judge.
This two-count takings action is before the Court on two dispositive motions: (1) the Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment of Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, which relates to Count I; and (2) the Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, which relates to Count II. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this suit under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (2000).
The Plaintiffs’ First Amended and Restated Complaint seeks “just compensation” in accordance with the Fifth Amendment for the defendant’s…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. Little Lake Misere Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Alder Terrace, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- The Japanese War Notes Association of the Philippines, Inc. (Japwancap, Inc.) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Boling v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Catellus Development Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Central Pines Land Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Dalles Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Central Pines Land Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Central Pines Land Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.