Legal Opinion

Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Barragate

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1932No. 23135PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court

(Kinkade, J.).

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. The action in that court was brought to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from negligence.

• The plaintiff, Maria Barragate, alleged in her petition that it was the duty of the defendant to so regulate and control the conduct of persons about to enter the street cars of the defendant as passengers, and particularly large crowds of persons, as to reasonably safeguard the individuals comprising such crowds from physical injuries resulting from crowding, and that the defendant was guilty…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Youngstown & Suburban Ry. Co. v. FaulkOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Youngstown & Suburban Ry. Co. v. FaulkOhio Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holdshoe v. WhineryOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Crawford v. HalkovicsOhio Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API