Legal Opinion

Wells v. O'Keefe

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 4, 1941No. 3199PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The excepting parties contend that the only evidence “to support the findings that Wells was and O’Keefe was not guilty of negligence contributing to cause the accident” is the testimony of O’Keefe himself, and that his testimony is too vague and self-contradictory to be entitled to any substantial weight.

The highway at the place where the accident happened comprised three lanes of cement, each approximately ten feet in width. O’Keefe was driving north toward Portsmouth and Wells was driving south toward Massachusetts. It was foggy and the lights of the motor vehicles on the road were lighted.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morris v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  2. Himmel v. FinkelsteinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  3. Prescott v. YurchusSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  4. Brody v. GilbertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  5. Hobbs v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Archibald v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API