Legal Opinion

Auchmuty v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1960No. 2911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Blume

This action was brought by the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, a common carrier, and the City of Sheridan against Forrest L. Auchmuty and Laura Mae Auchmuty to remove a dam over and across a certain ditch running in and outside of the City of Sheridan.

It is alleged in what is called the first claim in the petition that the railroad company owns certain lands adjacent to the dam hereinbefore mentioned; that the defendants are the owners of the NWj4 of the NW14 of Sec. 23, T. 56 N, R. 84 W of the 6th P.M.; that the tract of land owned by the defendants lies north and east of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Soules v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Nixon v. WelchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  3. Clarke v. BoysenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  4. Wilkins v. NicolaiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Darr v. Carolina Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White v. Wheatland Irrigation DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Shumway v. Tom Sanford, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API