Legal Opinion

Langley v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1933No. Docket No. Sac. 4796PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Appeal by defendant from judgment for plaintiffs in an action to recover upon a policy of automobile liability insurance issued by said defendant in favor of one W. T. Holland.

Plaintiffs, through the negligence of said Holland, suffered damage as the result of an automobile collision. They commenced an action against him under the name of W. H. instead of W. T. Holland. Service by publication was ordered and later a default judgment in the sum of $2,500 and costs was entered against him and in favor of plaintiffs. In order to recover the amount of said judgment, plaintiffs thereafter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ellsworth v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Boland v. All Persons Etc.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Palmer v. LantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Butte County v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Markley v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Emery v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Laughlin v. HughesOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Nye & Nissen, Inc. v. Central Surety & InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Rios v. SinghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API