Legal Opinion

State v. Fling

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1949No. 998PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LaPRADE, Chief Justice.

Clyde Fling, defendant-appellant, was by a jury convicted of the crime of aggravated assault, a felony. The “aggravation” had its origin in the allegation of the information that defendant assaulted the complaining witness in the private home of the latter. By section 43-603, A.C.A.1939, it is provided that when any person goes into a private home and there is guilty of an assault or battery, such assault or battery is “aggravated.” This appeal is from the resulting judgment and sentence to a term in the state penitentiary. Upon an additional count in the information…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Steckler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  3. In Re JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Burney v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Oliver v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. ZakharArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. BarkerArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. MarsinArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State v. MilehamArizona Supreme Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API