Legal Opinion
Maggi v. Pompa
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 5, 1930No. Docket No. 6986PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Plaintiff sued for damages for injuries inflicted upon him by the defendant Cesena, a special police officer. The cause was tried before a jury and resulted in a verdict for $15,000 in favor of plaintiff. Defendant Pompa appeals upon typewritten transcripts.
At the request of one Tony Pompa the defendant Cesena was appointed a special police officer by the police commissioners of the city and county of San Francisco on November 13, 1923, and was assigned to beat No. 97. Prior to his appointment Cesena was examined and recommended to the police commissioners by Captain Layne, a captain in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Robertson v. SichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Michel v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Tolchester Beach Improvement Co. v. SteinmeierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- Healey v. LothropMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Hershey v. O'NeillU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Noble v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Brown v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Cerri v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1948
- Shannon v. FleishhackerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Barbaria v. Independent Elevator Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.