Legal Opinion

Deprez v. Continental Western Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1998No. S-97-585PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormack, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Appellant, Leo G. Deprez, commenced this action against his insurer, appellee Continental Western Insurance Company (Continental Western), seeking payment under the uninsured motorists provision of his personal automobile policy. Continental Western moved for summary judgment. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of Continental Western and found that Deprez was no longer entitled to recover damages from the uninsured motorist with whom he had collided and that he had breached his insurance policy to the prejudice and detriment of Continental Western. Deprez appeals.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Heins v. Webster CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Tess v. LAYWERS TITLE INS. CORP.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Currie Ex Rel. Currie v. Chief School Bus Service, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Farmers Union Cooperative Insurance v. Allied Property & Casualty InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Katskee v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mefferd v. Sieler and Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Snowdon Farms v. JonesNebraska Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. McDaneld v. FischerNebraska Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Steffensmeier v. Le Mars Mut. Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Consolidated Nutrition, L.C. v. GroneNebraska Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API