Legal Opinion
Jimmy T. Bauknight v. Monroe County, Florida
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 25, 2006No. 05-10868PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:
The issue presented in this appeal is whether the district court abused .its dis cretion when it denied the appellants’ motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) for costs and attorneys’ fees incurred as a result of the appellee’s removal of the action to federal court. After oral argument and a thorough review of the record, we hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion, and accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
The appellants, Jimmy and Nancy A. Bauknight, H. Teague Skaggs, Jr., and George W. and Kathleen Rockett, own separately platted and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Carl Legg v. WyethCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City Of AlabasterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Frankie Mae R. Jennings v. Caddo Parish School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Roc Sansotta v. Town of Nags HeadCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Lott v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. The Hanover Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Whitney Information Network, Inc. v. Xcentric Ventures, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Rodney H. Williams v. Bruce PearsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.