Legal Opinion

Lott v. Pfizer, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 25, 2007No. 06-3372PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

On February 17, 2005, the plaintiffs filed a purported class action lawsuit against Pfizer in Illinois state court. Pfizer removed the case under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d), but the district court remanded it after concluding that CAFA only applies to lawsuits filed on or after February 18, 2005. The court then awarded the plaintiffs $23,664.83 in attorneys’ fees and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Pfizer appeals the award of fees and costs. For the following reasons, we reverse.

I. Background. Hoping to avoid removal to federal court, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Brosseau v. HaugenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Selective Service System v. Minnesota Public Interest Research GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. Lussier v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Kent State University Board of Trustees v. Lexington Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  3. Wolf v. KennellyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Micrometl Corp. v. Tranzact Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. Wisconsin v. Amgen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API