Legal Opinion

Rodney H. Williams v. Bruce Pearson

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 26, 2006No. 06-11953UnpublishedCited by 12 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Rodney H. Williams, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2241, on grounds that the district court erred by finding that he failed to raise a constitutionally cognizable claim. Williams filed his instant petition after the effective date of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”), Pub.L. No. 104-32, 110 Stat. 1214 (1996); therefore, the provisions of that act govern his appeal. For the reasons set forth more fully below, we affirm.

Williams, a federal prisoner who was convicted and sentenced to 86…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jones v. ZenkDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
  2. United States v. CooperDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2018
  3. Anusavice v. Woods (INMATE 2)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2021
  4. Bonilla v. Woods (INMATE 2) (LEAD)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2021
  5. Casper v. Chief United States Probation Officer, Southern District of Florida (INMATE 2)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API