Rothstein v. Aetna Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Jacobs, J.,
The principal issue in this case involves the construction of an exclusionary clause in an all-risk jewelry insurance policy.
*420Appellee, a manufacturing and wholesale jeweler, purchased the policy from appellant. While the policy was in effect a manufacturer’s representative, who was representing appellee, parked his automobile one afternoon in a parking lot in Fort Wayne, Indiana. A case containing appellee’s sample jewelry was locked in the trunk of the automobile. When the representative returned in approximately one hour to get his automobile, it had been stolen. The…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Armon v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Paull v. PivarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Rees v. Schuyl. R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sparler v. Fireman's Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Arcos Corporation v. American Mutual Liability Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Federal Insurance v. Susquehanna Broadcasting Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Volunteer Firemen's Insurance Services v. Cigna Property & Casualty Insurance AgencySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Nissel v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.