Legal Opinion

Rothstein v. Aetna Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1970No. Appeal, 1426PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

The principal issue in this case involves the construction of an exclusionary clause in an all-risk jewelry insurance policy.

*420Appellee, a manufacturing and wholesale jeweler, purchased the policy from appellant. While the policy was in effect a manufacturer’s representative, who was representing appellee, parked his automobile one afternoon in a parking lot in Fort Wayne, Indiana. A case containing appellee’s sample jewelry was locked in the trunk of the automobile. When the representative returned in approximately one hour to get his automobile, it had been stolen. The…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Armon v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Paull v. PivarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Rees v. Schuyl. R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sparler v. Fireman's Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Arcos Corporation v. American Mutual Liability Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Federal Insurance v. Susquehanna Broadcasting Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Volunteer Firemen's Insurance Services v. Cigna Property & Casualty Insurance AgencySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Nissel v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API