Roberson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted by a jury of three counts of delivery of cocaine. The court assessed punishment at two concurrent fifty-year sentences and a ten-year sentence, which was probated. The court of appeals reversed the judgment and remanded for a new trial, holding that appellant had not received effective assistance of counsel at trial. Roberson v. State, 798 S.W.2d 602 (Tex.App.—Austin, 1990) (Roberson I). On original appeal appellant challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to support each of his three convictions for delivery of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Delrio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Caldwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by91 opinions
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Ex Parte ChandlerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Giesberg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Edmond v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- Safari v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.