Legal Opinion

Safari v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided August 29, 1997No. 01-94-00751-CRPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HEDGES, Justice.

A jury found appellant, David Deyton Safari, guilty of unauthorized use of an automobile, and assessed punishment at 10 years in prison and a $5,000 fine. In four points of error, appellant argues that (1) the trial court erred in allowing a defense witness to invoke his right to remain silent and not testify after direct examination had begun; (2) trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance; (3) the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury-on the full range of punishment options; and (4) the trial court’s conduct throughout the trial denied him due process.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Cravin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  2. Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  3. Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  4. Bryant v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  5. Moreno v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API