Edmond v. State

OPINION

EVA M. GUZMAN, Justice.

In three points of error, Norman Edmond appeals his conviction and twenty-five year sentence for possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. Appellant contends his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress and failing to object to the disallowance of allocution. Appellant also argues the trial court’s alleged refusal to grant appellant allocution violated due process. We affirm.

Background

Appellant pled guilty to possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. The only evidence in the record of the circumstances of appellant’s arrest…