Legal Opinion

Bittker v. Groves

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1939No. Docket Nos. 77, 78, Calendar Nos. 40,510, 40,511PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Two like actions to recover damages occasioned by rain water to merchandise in two store buildings in the city of Ann Arbor are here consolidated, were so tried in the circuit court without a jury and separate judgments entered against defendant James A. Moynes & Company. In the Bittker and Frank case the State Savings Bank of Ann Arbor, Ben Groves, Florence Groves, Nellie Groves, Harold Groves and Jean Groves were also defendants and, at the close of plaintiffs’ proofs, on motion of their counsel and by consent of the attorneys for plaintiffs, they were discharged. Like action was had in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Wight v. H. G. Christman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Ludwigsen v. LarsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Federal Gravel Co. v. Detroit & MacKinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Rogers v. YoungsMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. GLARRATANO v. Weitz CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  2. Pastorelli v. Associated Engineers, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1959
  3. Detroit Independent Sprinkler Co. v. Plywood Products Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Couyoumjian v. BrimageMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. GLARRATANO v. Weitz CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API