Legal Opinion

Holland v. Johnson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1875PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPettit, J.

This suit was prosecuted by the appellants, 'William A. Holland and John Holland, against the appellee, David Johnson, on a promissory note, copied below, it being joint and several, and the Allens having been adjudged bankrupts before the suit was brought:

“ Six months after date, we or either of us promise to pay William A. and John Holland, six hundred and forty-five ■dollars and thirty-three cents, for value received, collectible without any relief from valuation or appraisement laws, with ten per cent, interest from date until paid.
“February 8th, 1873. Riley Allen.
“Hiram Allen.
“David…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knarr v. ConawayIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Stewart v. Davis'Indiana Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Heitman v. SchnekIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Mauzey v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. LetsingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Weik v. PughIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Sample v. CochranIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. McClelland v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Chrisman v. TuttleIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API