Heitman v. Schnek
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Jackson Circuit fcourt.
1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.
This was a proceeding on the part of the appellee against the appellant to have satisfaction entered of a mortgage on certain real estate owned by the appellant, and to quiet his title thereto.
The material facts stated in the complaint are these: That on the 7th day of September, 1865, Sarah Owens, Susan Heitman, and Elizabeth Kirsher were each the owners in fee simple of an undivided third part of the following described real estate, situated in the county of Jackson, Indiana, namely: The west half of the north-east quarter, of section 13, town 6, north of range 5 east, containing eighty…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lytle v. LytleIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Riser v. SnoddyIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
- Westfall v. StarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Bolster v. CatterlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- Johnson v. StebbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dudley v. PiggIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Gum-Elastic Roofing Co. v. Mexico Publishing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Berkshire v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Stafford v. DavidsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Hinkle v. MargerumIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.