Harad, Charles A. And the Home Insurance Company v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, and Catania, Francis J
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
COWEN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises from an order of the district court which held that, under the terms of an insurance contract issued by Aetna, Aetna had a duty to defend and indemnify its insured. The district court determined that Aetna had not established a meritorious defense and refused to vacate a default judgment which had been entered against Aetna. Since we conclude that the lower court misinterpreted the terms of the contract of insurance, and that an exclusion contained in the policy relieved Aetna of the duty to defend or indemnify its insured, we will…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- United States v. $55,518.05 in U.S. Currency. Appeal of Gary GoldenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- Budget Blinds, Inc. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Biborosch v. Transamerica InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Roe v. Federal InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- David B. Lilly Co. v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.