Smith v. Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MULLIGAN, Circuit Judge:
The only question raised in this appeal is whether the district court properly abstained in a diversity action. The complaint requested a declaration of the validity under Connecticut law of an exclusionary clause in an automobile insurance policy. The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Ellen Bree Burns, Judge, approved and adopted a ruling of a United States Magistrate Arthur H. Latimer that abstention was appropriate under Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of Thibodaux, 360 U.S. 25, 79 S.Ct. 1070, 3 L.Ed.2d 1058 (1959), in that the suit…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Earl G. Smith, Administrator of the Estate of Gary Dean Smith, Deceased v. Metropolitan Property and Liability Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Moos v. WellsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984