Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Averitt Express, Inc. v. State of Indiana ex rel. Indiana Department of Transportation

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 2014No. 67A05-1403-CC-108Published

1ConcurrenceBradford, Judge

While I concur with the disposition of the issues in all respects, I write separately to share some thoughts on both the admissibility of police-prepared accident reports and paragraph six of Trooper Mullen’s affidavit!

I. Trooper Mullen’s Accident Report

I agree that Trooper Mullen’s accident report should have been struck from the designated evidence, because it is clearly an “investigative” report authored by law-enforcement, prepared after interviewing witnesses and evaluating the physical evidence at the scene. See Evid. R. 803(8)(B)(i). That said, the traditional rationale for excluding…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kubsch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. McRae v. Echols, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  3. Fowler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Gardner v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Johnie J. Simmons v. Chicago and Northwestern Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API