Legal Opinion

Baranski v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 16, 2008No. 06-2203PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

Keith Baranski moved under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate or set aside his sentence for conspiracy to import machine guns illegally. Although the district court 1 denied the motion, it granted a certificate of ap-pealability to review its decision in light of Groh v. Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551, 124 S.Ct. 1284, 157 L.Ed.2d 1068 (2004). Baranski appeals, and we affirm.

Baranski was indicted for conspiracy to import machine guns by submitting false entries on forms for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and 26 U.S.C. § 5861© after ATF…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Kaufman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ronnie Ray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. RiesselmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. SheehanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
  5. Roderick Nunley v. Michael BowersoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API