Legal Opinion
Brodt v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 6, 2014No. 13 Civ. 3272(PKC)PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CASTEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Hyman Brodt, who represents himself pro se, brings thirteen claims of religious discrimination and retaliation against the City of New York (the “City”), its Department of Information Technology *565& Telecommunications (the “IT Department”) and two individual defendants, Lee Dicke and Michael Bimonte.
Brodt alleges that he was terminated and denied promotions under the pretext of budget limitations, when, in reality, the defendants discriminated against him on the basis of his Jewish faith. Plaintiff brings claims of retaliation and religious…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Doe v. Columbia UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Rice v. Smithtown VolkswagenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Delaurencio v. Brooklyn Children's Center, SuperintendentDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Culleton v. Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Ahmad v. DayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.