Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Green v. Casey

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1990No. 90-559PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Motions to dismiss test the sufficiency of the complaint. Assn. for the Defense of the Washington Local School Dist. v. Kiger (1989), 42 Ohio St. 3d 116, 537 N.E. 2d 1292. In their motion, however, respondents argue that relators’ complaint should be dismissed due to laches.

Respondents rely principally on State, ex rel. Hinkle, v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections (1989), 47 Ohio St. 3d 117, 548 N.E. 2d 231, in which we denied a writ of mandamus because a relator unjustifiably waited to file an election matter until after the absentee ballots were printed and mailed. See Section 11, Rule VIII of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ass'n for Defense of Washington Local School District v. KigerOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In re Protest Filed with the Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Senn v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State ex rel. Beck v. CaseyOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Saffold v. TimminsOhio Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cooker Restaurant Corp. v. Montgomery County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Citizens for Responsible Taxation v. Scioto County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Cooker Restaurant Corp. v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Yiamouyiannis v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State ex rel. Fite v. AehOhio Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API