Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Mosman v. Mathison

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1965No. 9485PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

Plaintiff Roy E. Mosman, as the prosecuting attorney of Nez Perce county, instituted this action against the defendants seeking a declaration that the road known as'Wapsheli road is a public road and also to enjoin defendant Mathison and his agents from obstructing the use of the roadway by the public.

The defendants, (other than the Cramont Scenic Highway District) are the owners of lessees of property through which the Wapsheli traverses, and the .Cramont Scenic Highway District is a highway district situate in Nez Perce County, and within which this road is situated.

The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Enders v. FridayNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Harrison v. Board of County Com'rsIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  3. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. WalmstadIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Levee Dist. No. 9 v. FarmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Rogers v. HaysIdaho Supreme Court · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Yamada v. Natural Disaster Claims CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Mathison v. FeltonIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Farrell v. Board of Com'rs, Lemhi CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Corbetta Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  5. Keller v. Magic Water CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API